The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission on Wednesday rearraigned Ismaila Mustapha, popularly known as Mompha before a Federal High Court, Lagos, over N32.9bn fraud.
Mompha was first arraigned by the commission on 14 counts bordering on fraud, money laundering and running a foreign exchange business without the authorisation of the Central Bank of Nigeria.
He was arraigned alongside his firm, Ismalob Global Investment Ltd.
He had pleaded not guilty to the charges and was granted bail in the sum of N100m with one surety in like sum.
Trial has since commenced in the suit, with the EFCC still leading witnesses in evidence.
When the case was called on Wednesday, the prosecutor, Mr Rotimi Oyedepo, informed the court of a second amended charge against the defendant and urged the court to allow a fresh plea by the defendant.
The amended 22-count charge was read over to the defendant and he pleaded not guilty to all counts.
After his plea, defence counsel, Mr Gboyega Oyewole (SAN), urged the court to grant a short adjournment to enable him study the new charge.
He told the court that he had only seen the new charge few minutes before the court commenced sitting and consequently urged the court to allow him study same.
Following agreement of parties, the court adjourned the case until March 18 for continuation of trial.
So far in the trial, the commission had called witnesses from commercial banks, CBN as well as the Special Control Unit Against Money Laundering.
In the charge, EFCC accused the defendant of procuring Ismalob Global Investment Ltd and retaining in its account an aggregate sum of N32.9bn between 2015 and 2018.
Prosecution alleged that Mompha laundered the sum through Ismalob Global Investment Ltd.
Both defendants were alleged to have negotiated foreign exchange transactions in various sums like N9.4m, N20m, N10.4m, N2.4m, N100m, N61m, N40.7m, N42m among others.
Mompha was alleged to have aided Ismalob to retain an aggregate sum of N14bn in its account, which was procured from Pitacalize Ltd.
The offences contravenes the provisions of sections 15(2) and 18(3) of the Money Laundering Prohibition Act.2011 as amended.